Read Time: 5 minutes

Introduction:

The Problem of Evil is one of the most common arguments used to try to disprove God, generally in monotheistic belief, a belief in a single God. People use it because suffering is hard to understand, and this argument is often used by those who have been hurt in some way, though not always.

Definitions and Language:

Definition of Evil: Evil is the lack, absence or perversion of good.

Definition of Original Sin: Original sin is the deprivation of original holiness and justice, which we carry because of the first sin of our first parents.

Definition of Metaphysical: The understanding of the fundamental features or limitations built into reality itself.

What is the Problem of evil:

The Problem of Evil is an argument that the existence of suffering makes it impossible or hard to believe that an all-good and all-powerful God could exist.

Types of Evil:

There are two main types of evil discussed in this argument: Natural evil and moral evil. These distinctions matter because every type of evil has a different reason for existing.

Moral evil – Unlike natural evil, which comes from natural processes, moral evil comes from human free will. Without free will, the greater good of choosing virtue, the highest form of good, would not be possible. Choosing God also depends on this same freedom. This is why God didn’t just make a world full of happy atoms. For example, yes, happiness is a natural good, but it is meaningless if it is not originally chosen or formed through the evils we experience in our lives. Many greater goods come from allowing moral evil.

Not all moral evil is equal, and we don’t mean comparing murder to stealing. We mean some moral evils are sometimes justifiable, like imprisonment for a crime to rehabilitate and punish for a worse moral evil, like murder.

Natural evil – For a physical world to exist, it has to run on natural processes. That means things grow, die and decay. For example, grass is eaten by grazers, and grazers are eaten by predators. These processes are necessary features of healthy ecosystems. Disease can build immunity, population pressures can stabilise species, and natural evil can make us more aware, thankful for what we have. Without natural evil, it is hard for the world to renew itself, which is necessary for life, unless the world is static with no new growth and if all natural processes were fully controlled by God like a puppet show.

Metaphysical evil – Many natural evils are due to metaphysical “evils.” These are not evil in the traditional sense but the limitations of a finite world, such as ageing, lack of knowledge and even cancer, because the body is made of parts and anything made of parts can fail. The reason God may not always intervene is that a natural world needs natural laws. These laws would be meaningless if God constantly bypassed them.

Furthermore, if there were constant growth without renewal, that would cause us to run out of resources and lead to overpopulation. Other evils, like crippling diseases, may make us more likely to use our reasoning and even expand our free will to choose or reject God. Natural evil is necessary for the growth of the world, not its stability.

Misdefining evil – Last of all, we need to express that not everything called moral evil is a real evil. This happens a lot when there is a disagreement about what can be called evil, for example, LGBTQ+, abortion, IVF, or problematic cohabitation.

The Logical Problem of Evil:

The Augments often used by sceptics:

• 1, Some evils in the world don’t seem to have any good reason behind them.

• 2, If there are any supernatural beings, the idea that they simply don’t care about this pointless suffering fits the evidence better than the idea of an all‑good, all-powerful God.

• 3, So, based on the evidence, it’s more likely that the traditional God, the one who is all‑powerful and perfectly God, does not exist.

There is a flaw in this argument’s reasoning that even some atheist philosophers point out. It’s called the noseeum problem. The argument basically says: “I don’t see a reason for this evil; therefore, there is no reason,” or “If I can’t see something, then it doesn’t exist.”

This is a problem because human knowledge is limited and finite, not unlimited and infinite. We can’t know everything, and we could easily be missing a possible reason for this evil. It is not the same as saying “God works in mysterious ways” but it expresses human limitation.

Catholic Theology:

This part is about Catholic theology. The first sin, or Original Sin, damaged the relationship between God and mankind. This damaged relationship caused a separation of humanity from the original harmony, which led to both natural and moral evil that are used for the purposes we already described. This is also why Jesus needed to die for the forgiveness of our sins.

Earlier in the article, when I said, “Without natural evil, it is hard for the world to renew itself, which is necessary for life, unless the world is static with no new growth and if all natural processes were fully controlled by God like a puppet show.” That is true, but we believe God would renew the earth to perfect it. By that point, there will be no more growth in population; the world would be stable, so there is no more need for metaphysical evil, though that doesn’t change the fact that we are finite beings compared to God, the only infinite being.

There also would be no more options to choose or reject God because we would have already chosen whether we want him or not. If we choose God as a gift, our will gets perfected, and we get to enjoy the new world with him. However, if we rejected him, we would get eternal separation.

Conclusion:

The problem of evil is very easy to dismantle once you understand the use of evil. Many greater goods, such as virtues, can come from allowing evil.