Solving the Problem of Evil

Read Time: 4 minutes

The Problem of Evil is one of the most common explanations used to try to disprove God, generally in the monotheistic belief in a single God. People use it because suffering is hard to understand and this argument is often used by those who have been hurt in some way, though not always.

Definition of Evil: Evil is the lack, absence or perversion of a good.

Definition of Original sin: Original sin is the deprivation of original holiness and justice, which we carry because of the first sins of our first parents.

Definition of Metaphysical: The understanding of the fundamental features or limitations built into reality itself.

The Problem of Evil is an argument that the existence of suffering makes it impossible or hard to believe in an all good and all-powerful God could exist.

There are two main types of evil discussed in this argument: Natural evil and moral evil. These distinctions matters because every type of evil has a have different reason for existing.

Moral evil – Unlike natural evil, which comes from natural processes, moral evil comes from human free will. Without free will, the greater good of choosing virtue, the highest form of good, would not be possible. Choosing God also depends on this same freedom. This is why God didn’t just make a world full of happy atoms. For example, yes, happiness is a natural good, but it is meaningless if it is not originally chosen or formed through the evils we experience in our lives. Many greater goods come from allowing moral evil.

Not all moral evil is equal, and we don’t mean comparing murder to stealing. We mean some moral evils are sometimes justifiable, like imprisonment for a crime to rehabilitate and punish for a worse moral evil like murder.

Natural evil For a physical world to exist, it has to run on natural processes. That means things grow, die and decay. For example, grass is eaten by grazers, and grazers are eaten by predators. These processes are necessary features of healthy ecosystems. Disease can build immunity, population pressures can stabilise species and natural evil can make us more aware, thankful and grateful for what we have. Without natural evil, it is hard for the world to renew itself, which is necessary for life, unless the world static with no new growth and if all natural prosses was fully controlled by God like a puppet show.

Many of these natural evils are due to metaphysical “evils.” These are not evil in the traditional sense but the limitations of a finite world, such as ageing, lack of knowledge, and even cancer; because the body is made of parts and anything made of parts can fail. The reason God may not always intervene because a natural world needs natural laws. These laws would be meaningless if God constantly bypassed them.

Furthermore, if there was constant growth without renewal, that would cause us to run out of resources and lead to overpopulation. Other evils, like crippling diseases, may make us more likely to use our reasoning and even expand our free will to choose or reject God. Natural evil is necessary for the growth of the world, not its stability.

The Augments often used by sceptics:

  1. There are some evils in the world that don’t seem to have any good reason behind them.
  2. If there are any supernatural beings, the idea that they simply don’t care about this pointless suffering fits the evidence better than the idea of an all‑good, all-powerful God.
  3. So, based on the evidence, it’s more likely that the traditional God, the one who is all‑powerful and perfectly God, does not exist.

There is a flaw in this argument’s reasoning that even some atheist philosophers point out. It’s called the noseeum problem. The argument basically says: “I don’t see a reason for this evil, therefore there is no reason,” or “If I can’t see something, then it doesn’t exist.”

This is a problem because human knowledge is limited and finite, not unlimited and infinite. It not possible for us to know everything and we could easily be missing a possible reason for this evil. It is not the same as saying “God works in mysterious ways but expressing human limitation.

This part is about Catholic theology. The first sin or Original Sin damaged the relationship between God and mankind. This damaged relationship caused a separation of humanity from the original harmony, which led to both natural and moral evil that are used for the purposes we already described. This is also why Jesus needed to die for the forgiveness of our sins.

The problem of evil is very easy to dismantle once you understand the use of evils. Many greater goods, such as virtues, can come from allowing evil.


Discover more from Light Before Breath

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Calvin Gibson avatar

Posted by

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Light Before Breath

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading